Comments on Commentaries About Cultural Psychology
نویسندگان
چکیده
I wish to thank Andrei Brushlinkii for his kind invitation to enter into a discussion with Russian colleagues who have taken the time to read and comment on my recent book. The invitation to discuss the role of culture in human development in this forum is, as the expression goes, “the opportunity of a lifetime” because I have sought to promote dialogue between American and Russian psychologists for most of my professional life – long enough to know how rare and difficult such dialogues can be. It is almost exactly 38 years to the day since I arrived at the old Sheremetovo airport (the old, old Sheremetovo) ready to begin a post-doctoral research working under the guidance of Alexander Luria. During that year I worked not only with Luria and his students, but with Evgenii Sokolov and the members of his laboratory and with colleagues at the Institute of Higher Nervous Actvity. I was exceptionally fortunate to be given a warm welcome and generous support by my hosts, to whom I remain indebted to this day. The 1962-1963 academic year was anything but a placid time in Moscow. The end of “the thaw” had arrived. For several weeks that fall we sat huddled around our radio in the company of Cuban students, knowing how close the world was to thermonuclear holocaust, a concern which was not felt so sharply by our Russian peers, who did not have access to such radios, and whose own media minimized the dangerous passage through which the world was going. Our Russian acquaintances had their own concerns, among which was the harm that would come to them if they became too friendly with us -the ino-strantsi who came from that other world. It did not seem even remotely possible in 1962 that some day, when I had grown older than Alexander Romanovich was when I first met him, I would be responding to a series of commentaries about a book which, in large measure, he helped to make possible. I did not arrive in Moscow knowing much about cultural-historical psychology and I did not leave knowing much more The first, abbreviated, translation of Myishlenie i Rech first appeared in English while I was in Moscow. But I did not have a copy of the translation and I was too busy pursuing empirical research on orienting responses and semantic conditional reflexes in temporal lobe patients to take time out to read the book in Russian. Besides, although Alexander Romanovich seemed to think Vygotsky’s ideas very important, Vygotsky didn’t seem to have much to say about semantic reflexes and I was disinclined to spend my time studying someone so “old fashioned.” In this respect, I was a typical product of American graduate training, then and now.
منابع مشابه
The Primacy of Teacher Imperative Commentaries in the Improvement of Iranian English Majors’ Writing Ability
In this study, the researchers investigated a critical aspect of EFL/ESL writing pedagogy-the impact of teacher written commentary on student writer’s earlier drafts. Compositions of 80 Iranian undergraduate English majors were commented on using a trio of imperatives, statements, and questions on both content and form. Overall, the results indicated that the comments in the imperative form hel...
متن کاملEpistemological Dizziness in the Psychology Laboratory: Lively Subjects, Anxious Experimenters, and Experimental Relations, 1950-1970.
Since the demise of introspective techniques in the early twentieth century, experimental psychology has largely assumed an administrative arrangement between experimenters and subjects wherein subjects respond to experimenters' instructions and experimenters meticulously constrain that relationship through experimental controls. During the postwar era this standard arrangement came to be quest...
متن کاملReply to the commentaries on "An evolutionary framework for cultural change: selectionism versus communal exchange".
The commentators have brought a wealth of new perspectives to the question of how culture evolves. Each of their diverse disciplines--ranging from psychology to biology to anthropology to economics to engineering--has a valuable contribution to make to our understanding of this complex, multifaceted topic. Though the vast majority of their comments were supportive of my approach, it is natural ...
متن کاملFacts, paradigms, and anomalies in the acceptance of energy psychology: A rejoinder to McCaslin's (2009) and Pignotti and Thyer's (2009) comments on Feinstein (2008a).
Allegations of selection bias and other departures from critical thinking in Feinstein (see record 2008-07317-008) found in the Pignotti and Thyer (see record 2009-08897-011), and the McCaslin (see record 2009-08897-010) commentaries, are addressed. Inaccuracies and bias in the reviewers' comments are also examined. The exchange is shown to reflect a paradigmatic clash within the professional c...
متن کاملCultural Formulation Interview: The Role of Culture in Psychopathology
Culture as a set of beliefs, values, laws, and customs which influence all aspects of human life can have a significant role in shaping psychopathology and psychological disorders. The purpose of this study that conducted via the descriptive-analytic method is to investigate the role of culture in psychopathology and abnormal behaviorschr('39') incidence with the emphasis on cultural formulatio...
متن کاملData, methods and interpretation in analyses of cultural consumption: A reply to Peterson and Wuggenig
Peterson’s and Wuggenig’s critical comments refer specifically to our paper ‘Social stratification and cultural consumption: the Visual Arts in England’ (Chan and Goldthorpe, 2007c). However, their criticisms could, at least in some of their more general aspects, be taken to apply to all of the contributions to the special issue of Poetics in which our paper appeared, and of which we were Guest...
متن کامل